The work explores the nuances of etiquette surrounding revolving doors, particularly the question of who should enter first when a man and a woman approach together. It presents contrasting views: one suggesting that the man should lead to provide momentum, while the other insists on the traditional "Ladies first" principle. The text humorously critiques the inconsistency of this principle, noting that while women may enjoy initiating various forms of change, they may not appreciate the act of starting a revolving door. The discussion extends to general door etiquette, highlighting geographical variations in customs. In some cultures, men precede women when entering rooms, while in others, women enter first, depending on the door's design. The author whimsically traces the American custom back to prehistoric times, suggesting that it stems from a cave-man's desire to ensure safety for his partner. The narrative emphasizes the absurdity of rigid adherence to etiquette, particularly in situations where it leads to awkwardness or discomfort. It illustrates a scenario where a man insists on allowing a woman to enter first through a half-open door, resulting in a comical struggle that risks both parties' well-being. The author advocates for a more practical approach, where the man holds the door open for the woman, allowing her to pass gracefully while he maintains a respectful demeanor. Overall, the work combines humor and social commentary to critique the complexities of gender roles and etiquette in modern society, ultimately suggesting that practicality and consideration should take precedence over rigid adherence to outdated customs.
By Oliver Herford · First published 1910 · Genre: Humor, Social Commentary, Essay