The Value of Greek and Latin in English Literature by Arthur Quiller-Couch

Well, now, I put it to you that without mental breeding, without at least some sense of ancestry, an Englishman can hardly have this perception of value, this vision. I put to you what I posited in an earlier course of lectures, quoting Bagehot, that while a knowledge of Greek and Latin is not necessary to a writer of English, he should at least have a firm conviction that those two languages existed. I refer you to a long passage which, in one of those lectures, I quoted from Cardinal Newman to the effect that for the last 3,000 years the Western World has been evolving a human society, having its bond in a common civilisation -- a society to which (let me add, by way of footnote) Prussia today is firmly, though with great difficulty, being tamed.

There are, and have been, other civilisations in the world -- the Chinese, for instance; a huge civilisation, stationary, morose, to us unattractive; "but this civilisation," says Newman, "together with the society which is its creation and its home, is so distinctive and luminous in its character, so imperial in its extent, so imposing in its duration, and so utterly without rival upon the face of the earth, that the association may fitly assume for itself the title of ‘Human Society,' and its civilisation the abstract term ‘Civilisation."