Choice exerted by the female-Length of courtship-Unpaired birds-Mental qualities and taste for the beautiful-Preference or antipathy shewn by the female for particular males-Variability of birds-Variations sometimes abrupt-Laws of variation-Formation of ocelli-Gradations of character-Case of Peacock, Argus pheasant, and Urosticte.
When the sexes differ in beauty or in the power of singing, or in producing what I have called instrumental music, it is almost invariably the male who surpasses the female. These qualities, as we have just seen, are evidently of high importance to the male. When they are gained for only a part of the year it is always before the breeding-season. It is the male alone who elaborately displays his varied attractions, and often performs strange antics on the ground or in the air, in the presence of the female. Each male drives away, or if he can, kills his rivals. Hence we may conclude that it is the object of the male to induce the female to pair with him, and for this purpose he tries to excite or charm her in various ways; and this is the opinion of all those who have carefully studied the habits of living birds. But there remains a question which has an all important bearing on sexual selection, namely, does every male of the same species excite and attract the female equally?
Sign in to unlock this title
Sign in to continue reading, it's free! As an unregistered user you can only read a little bit.
