
The Gospels are a collection of four books that tell the story of Jesus Christ's life and teachings. They were written by different authors at different times, but they all share similar themes and messages. The credibility of these texts has been debated for centuries, with some scholars arguing that they contain historical inaccuracies or exaggerations. However, many others believe that the Gospels provide valuable insight into the life and teachings of Jesus Christ, and are an important part of Christian tradition.
By George Bernard Shaw · First published 1932 · Genre: Religious Criticism, Philosophical Essay, Theological Analysis · 491 words
It will be noted by the older among my readers, who are sure to be obsessed more or less by elderly wrangles as to whether the gospels are credible as matter-of-fact narratives, that I have hardly raised this question, and have accepted the credible and incredible with equal complacency. I have done this because credibility is a subjective condition, as the evolution of religious belief clearly shows. Belief is not dependent on evidence and reason. There is as much evidence that the miracles occurred as that the battle of Waterloo occurred, or that a large body of Russian troops passed through England in 1914 to take part in the war on the western front. The reasons for believing in the murder of Pompey are the same as the reasons for believing in the raising of Lazarus. Both have been believed and doubted by men of equal intelligence. Miracles, in the sense of phenomena we cannot explain, surround us on every hand; life itself is the miracle of miracles.
Credibility of the Gospels is listed on Textopian as an essay by George Bernard Shaw, dated 1932 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Gospels · Christianity · Religion · Faith · Historical analysis · Biblical criticism · Theology · Philosophy · Literature · Truth · Narrative · Mythology