
A wolf, believing himself injured by a thief, brings his neighbour the fox to court. The fox’s bad character is widely acknowledged, while a monkey serves as judge despite seeming ill suited to the office of justice. Both wolf and fox argue fiercely, appeal to the laws, and leave the monkey perplexed. When their dispute is finished, the judge declares that he knows both their characters and fines them both: the wolf for making a groundless accusation, and the fox for being guilty of the charge. He concludes that only a villain could be fined, whether rightly or wrongly.
By Jean de La Fontaine · First published 1668 · Genre: Fable, Didactic Literature, Allegory · 365 words
A wolf, affirming his belief / That he had suffer'd by a thief, / Brought up his neighbour fox -- / Of whom it was by all confess'd, / His character was not the best -- / To fill the prisoner's box. / As judge between these vermin, / A monkey graced the ermine; / And truly other gifts of Themis[1] / Did scarcely seem his; / For while each party plead his cause, / Appealing boldly to the laws, / And much the question vex'd, / Our monkey sat perplex'd. / Their words and wrath expended, / Their strife at length was ended; / When, by their malice taught, / The judge this judgment brought: / 'Your characters, my friends, I long have known, / As on this trial clearly shown; / And hence I fine you both -- the grounds at large / To state would little profit -- / You wolf, in short, as bringing groundless charge, / You fox, as guilty of it.'
animal fable · French classical literature · seventeenth-century France · verse narrative · courtroom setting · legal dispute · false accusation · theft · wolf · fox · monkey judge · animal allegory
The Wolf Accusing the Fox before the Monkey is listed on Textopian as a fable by Jean de La Fontaine, dated 1668 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.