
The narrative unfolds in Kentucky during a period when strict laws prohibited games of chance. A group of boys is caught playing card games for money, leading to legal repercussions. Jim Sturgis, their defense attorney, initially faces a seemingly unwinnable case due to the clear evidence of gambling. However, after much contemplation, he devises a bold strategy: he argues that the game in question, "old sledge," is not a game of chance but rather a game of science. Sturgis's audacity draws laughter from the courtroom, but he remains steadfast in his position. The opposing counsel attempts to undermine his argument, yet Sturgis persists, insisting that the burden of proof lies with those claiming it is a game of chance. The judge, intrigued yet skeptical, calls upon local deacons and dominies to testify, all of whom affirm that the game is indeed a game of chance. In a surprising twist, Sturgis proposes a jury composed of both sides—those who believe in luck and those who believe in science—to settle the matter. The jury, consisting of six representatives from each camp, is tasked with playing the game to determine its true nature. As the jury deliberates, the audience eagerly anticipates the outcome. Over the course of the night, the "chance" jurors repeatedly fail to win, while the "science" jurors succeed. By morning, the jury returns with a verdict declaring that "old sledge" is a game of science, not chance. They cite the evidence of their gameplay, noting that the chance players lost consistently and ended up financially depleted, while the science players emerged victorious. The verdict not only absolves the boys of legal consequences but also establishes a precedent in Kentucky law, categorizing the game as one of science. The story concludes with a reflection on the absurdity of the situation, highlighting the interplay between luck and skill in games, and the societal implications of labeling one as superior to the other. The case serves as a commentary on the nature of chance, skill, and the often arbitrary distinctions made in legal and social contexts.
By Mark Twain · First published 1880 · Genre: Satire, Humor, Legal Fiction · 1,166 words
[Written about 1867.]
Science V. s. Luck is listed on Textopian as a short story by Mark Twain, dated 1880 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Satire · Humor · Philosophy · Science · Luck · Fate · Chance · Morality · Ethics · Reason · Emotion · Rationality