Ideal Tory and Whig

Name: Ideal Tory and Whig
Author: Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The work explores the philosophical and political dichotomy between two historical factions: the Tories and the Whigs. It posits that both groups, despite their differing concerns regarding the balance of power among the monarchy, the aristocracy, and the populace, ultimately share a common goal of preserving this balance. The Tories are portrayed as more protective of the balance against popular influence, while the Whigs are more concerned about the encroachments of the Crown. The author reflects on the historical context, suggesting that both factions have, at times, shifted their positions based on the prevailing political climate, indicating a pragmatic approach to governance. The text suggests that the Tories, despite their historical allegiance, adapted during the Revolution while maintaining their core identity. The author expresses a desire to critically analyze the evolution of Whiggism, tracing its origins from notable figures like Dryden's portrayal of Shaftesbury to contemporary representatives. The zenith of Whiggism is identified during the latter years of Queen Anne's reign, characterized by a rational and sensible approach to governance. However, the author also notes a decline in the Whig spirit of compromise, leading to ineffectiveness in modern politics. The work serves as a commentary on the nature of political ideologies, their historical development, and the implications of their evolution on contemporary governance. It emphasizes the importance of understanding these dynamics to appreciate the complexities of political identity and the necessity of balance in a functioning democracy.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1816 · Genre: Political Philosophy, Essay, Historical Analysis · 362 words

First lines

The ideal Tory and the ideal Whig (and some such there have really been) agreed in the necessity and benefit of an exact balance of the three estates: but the Tory was more jealous of the balance being deranged by the people; the Whig, of its being deranged by the Crown. But this was a habit, a jealousy only; they both agreed in the ultimate preservation of the balance; and accordingly they might each, under certain circumstances, without the slightest inconsistency, pass from one side to the other, as the ultimate object required it. This the Tories did at the Revolution, but remained Tories as before.

What this Textopian page supports

Ideal Tory and Whig is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1816 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Work type: Essay
Author: Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Date: 1816 CE
Language: English
Genres: Political Philosophy, Essay, Historical Analysis, Critique, Literary Analysis
Length: 362 words
Structure: 1 section, 2 paragraphs
Reading fit: Standard (8th-9th Grade)

Good citation fit

Work identity for Ideal Tory and Whig by Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Canonical title URL and first readable passage URL
Genre and topic classification from the Textopian catalog
Readability and classroom-planning context
Passage-specific claims should cite the exact /read/ URL for the relevant chapter or paragraph

Discussion starters

What should a reader notice first when entering Ideal Tory and Whig?
How does this essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge fit its genre, period, or classroom use?
Where does Political Philosophy first become important in the reading?

Similar titles

Genres

Political Philosophy — The work discusses the ideological differences and historical context of Tory and Whig political thought.
Essay — The text is structured as a critical and philosophical essay, analyzing political ideologies.
Historical Analysis — It examines the historical evolution of political parties and their impact on governance.
Critique — The author critiques the Whig party and its development over time.