Reformed House of Commons

Name: Reformed House of Commons
Author: Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The work critiques the political landscape following the passage of the Reform Bill, highlighting the rapid and often contradictory actions of the newly formed House of Commons. The author expresses disappointment in the quality of representation, suggesting that many members prioritize personal interests over principled debate. The text illustrates a specific incident where a significant tax reduction was initially approved by a large majority, only to be rescinded shortly after without substantial justification. This inconsistency serves as a microcosm of the broader issues within the parliamentary system, reflecting a lack of integrity and foresight among its members. The author emphasizes the dangers of such behavior, warning that it undermines the effectiveness and credibility of governance. The work ultimately calls for a more principled and responsible approach to political representation, advocating for a House of Commons that prioritizes the public good over individual gain.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1830 · Genre: Political Commentary, Social Critique, Essay · 302 words

First lines

Well, I think no honest man will deny that the prophetic denunciations of those who seriously and solemnly opposed the Reform Bill are in a fair way of exact fulfilment! For myself, I own I did not expect such rapidity of movement. I supposed that the first parliament would contain a large number of low factious men, who would vulgarize and degrade the debates of the House of Commons, and considerably impede public business, and that the majority would be gentlemen more fond of their property than their politics. But really the truth is something more than this. Think of upwards of 160 members voting away two millions and a half of tax on Friday[1], at the bidding of whom, shall I say? and then no less than 70 of those very members rescinding their votes on the Tuesday next following, nothing whatever having intervened to justify the change, except that they had found out that at least seven or eight millions more must go also upon the same principle, and that the revenue was cut in two! Of course I approve the vote of rescission, however dangerous a precedent; but what a picture of the composition of this House of Commons!

What this Textopian page supports

Reformed House of Commons is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1830 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Work type: Essay
Author: Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Date: 1830 CE
Language: English
Genres: Political Commentary, Social Critique, Essay, Historical Analysis, Philosophical Discourse
Length: 302 words
Structure: 1 section, 2 paragraphs
Reading fit: Fairly Difficult (10th-12th Grade)

Good citation fit

Work identity for Reformed House of Commons by Samuel Taylor Coleridge
Canonical title URL and first readable passage URL
Genre and topic classification from the Textopian catalog
Readability and classroom-planning context
Passage-specific claims should cite the exact /read/ URL for the relevant chapter or paragraph

Discussion starters

What should a reader notice first when entering Reformed House of Commons?
How does this essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge fit its genre, period, or classroom use?
Where does Political Commentary first become important in the reading?

Similar titles

Genres

Political Commentary — The work critiques the political dynamics and behaviors within the House of Commons, focusing on the implications of the Reform Bill.
Social Critique — It addresses societal issues related to governance and the character of political representatives.
Essay — The format and style resemble an essay, presenting arguments and reflections on political events.
Historical Analysis — It provides insights into the historical context of the Reform Bill and its impact on parliamentary proceedings.