St. John's Gospel and the Logos

St. John's Gospel and the Logos

The work examines the dual purpose of the Gospel attributed to St. John: to affirm both the divinity and the humanity of Jesus Christ. It critiques interpretations of specific biblical passages, particularly the notion that the blood and water from Jesus' side serve solely as evidence of his death, arguing instead that they signify his genuine human nature. The author expresses skepticism about the authenticity of certain verses, particularly 1 John 5:7, suggesting that they disrupt the logical flow of the text. The author contrasts the logical styles of St. John and St. Paul, noting that St. John's approach is more straightforward and rooted in Eastern thought, while St. Paul's is intricate and dialectical. The work posits that the essence of Christianity is inherent within individuals, transcending textual authenticity. The authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews is debated, with the author favoring Apollos over St. Paul, citing the text's structure and historical context. The first three Gospels are described as historical accounts fulfilling prophecies, while St. John's Gospel is characterized as a declaration of doctrine that stands on its own merit. The author discusses the term "Logos," noting its prior usage by Philo and its significance in Jewish thought, emphasizing that it refers to a divine being rather than a mere symbol. The interpretation of the Greek preposition "pros" is analyzed, suggesting it indicates a close relationship without confusion of identity. The work critiques Gnostic interpretations of the Logos, asserting that St. John's declaration of the Logos as existing "in the beginning" counters the notion of the Logos as a secondary entity. The author emphasizes the distinction between understanding and reason, arguing that true reasoning leads to necessary conclusions rather than mere assertions. This distinction is presented as fundamental to a sound psychological framework, with implications for philosophy and religion. The text ultimately seeks to clarify the nature of Christ and the foundational principles of Christian belief through a rigorous examination of scriptural interpretation and theological concepts.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1825 · Genre: Theological Criticism, Philosophical Discourse, Biblical Exegesis · 1,162 words

First lines

St. John had a twofold object in his Gospel and his Epistles, -- to prove the divinity, and also the actual human nature and bodily suffering, of Jesus Christ, -- that he was God and Man. The notion that the effusion of blood and water from the Saviour's side was intended to prove the real _death_ of the sufferer originated, I believe, with some modern Germans, and seems to me ridiculous: there is, indeed, a very small quantity of water occasionally in the precordia: but in the pleura, where wounds are not generally mortal, there is a great deal. St. John did not mean, I apprehend, to insinuate that the spear-thrust made the _death_, merely as such, certain or evident, but that the effusion showed the human nature. "I saw it," he would say, "with my own eyes. It was real blood, composed of lymph and crassamentum, and not a mere celestial ichor, as the Phantasmists allege."

What this Textopian page supports

St. John's Gospel and the Logos is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1825 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Discussion starters

Similar titles

Genres

Tags

St. John's Gospel · Logos · Christianity · divinity · human nature · bodily suffering · Jesus Christ · theology · philosophy · Coleridge · Gnosticism · Arianism

More by Samuel Taylor Coleridge