
A satirical allegory unfolds through a dispute between two exalted creatures representing established authority, as they condemn a third animal for its ambiguous identity. The contentious creature attempts to align itself with a higher order by displaying an attribute—its wings—while its inherent nature, marked by a broad snout instead of a beak, betrays its true position. Throughout the debate, the exalted figures maintain that established categories must remain distinct. They denounce the creature’s pretensions to belong to the realm of the noble, insisting that its hybrid character disqualifies it from either camp. Citing its physical limitations and inappropriate demeanor, the debate culminates in a decision to exile the ambiguous being from both domains, condemning it to solitary wandering in the dark. The work functions as a cautionary commentary on the dangers of attempting to be more than one thing at once, using the natural order as a metaphor for social, political, or intellectual categorical boundaries. In doing so, it underscores the inevitability of exclusion for those who fail to conform to clearly defined roles and criticizes the inherent folly of duplicity.
By Tomás de Iriarte · First published 1782 · Genre: Fable, Allegory, Satire · 290 words
The Eagle and Lion / Held solemn debate; / To settle between them / Some matters of state
Loud complaints of the Bat / Made the Eagle -- "How long / Shall this pitiful creature / Dare do us such wrong?
With my vassals mixing, / To her birdship she clings, -- / As proof irrefragable, / Showing her wings;
But says, when she chooses / Our laws to defy, / I'm no subject of yours; / A plain quadruped I.
The Lion, Eagle and Bat is listed on Textopian as a fable by Tomás de Iriarte, dated 1782 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Allegory · Fable · Animal symbolism · Metaphor · Baroque · Satire · Poetry · Riddle · Classic · Moral · Imagery · Wit