Trials of a Publisher

Trials of a Publisher by Agnes Repplier

"Trials of a Publisher" by Agnes Repplier examines the professional hardships endured by John Murray, the celebrated London publisher, drawing on the recently published volumes of his memoirs and correspondence to overturn the popular assumption that publishers prosper at the expense of suffering authors. Repplier opens by challenging the conventional wisdom of Murray's era, which held that publishers were autocrats who grew wealthy by exploiting writers. The familiar quip that "Now Barabbas was a publisher" reflected widespread sympathy for authors and suspicion of those who profited from their work. Murray, however, emerges from his own correspondence not as a tyrant but as a man of extraordinary patience, generosity, and forbearance who was subjected to relentless demands, impertinence, and ingratitude from nearly every quarter. His Scottish business partners, Constable and James Ballantyne, treated the London firm as a convenient source of funds, with Ballantyne borrowing so frequently and so heavily that Murray was eventually forced to sever the connection. His partial ownership of Blackwood's Magazine caused him continuous distress, as the journal's habit of delivering pointed personal attacks on public figures generated a steady stream of angry letters directed at Murray himself, since editor Gifford scrupulously protected the anonymity of contributors. Even the Quarterly Review, Murray's own proudest creation, was a source of sleepless nights, its editor being constitutionally indifferent to publication deadlines and its contents reliably offending someone with each new issue. The essay then surveys the parade of impecunious writers whose dealings with Murray ranged from the merely presumptuous to the genuinely extraordinary. James Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, borrowed money with the serene confidence of royalty, condescended to Murray with magnificent self-importance, and when loans were delayed, complained bitterly about being unable to afford a Christmas goose. Leigh Hunt offered his unfinished poem "The Story of Rimini" at a price his friends assured him was too low, accepted Murray's far more modest counter-proposal, received payment in advance of what was owed, and then immediately proposed that Murray purchase the copyright outright for the full four hundred and fifty pounds he had originally demanded. The subsequent negotiations were so exhausting that a letter from Blackwood congratulating Murray on finally escaping Hunt's correspondence reads as entirely sincere. Madame de Staël presented difficulties of a different kind. Murray paid fifteen hundred pounds for the English and French editions of her work on Germany and lost money on the transaction. Her son subsequently wrote demanding four thousand pounds for a later work, with a tone Repplier compares to that of a footpad. Murray declined, and the book, when eventually published after de Staël's death by another firm, proved a failure. The most elaborate episode involves Coleridge, who proposed to translate Faust and opened negotiations with a letter of stupendous length expressing superb contempt for the reading public, philosophical reluctance to work for money, and extended meditations on language as sacred fire and the Muses as vestal priestesses. When Murray responded with a businesslike offer of one hundred pounds, Coleridge replied with a second letter even longer than the first, declaring the sum inadequate for work executed to the utmost of his powers. The translation was never made, and Repplier suggests that even Murray's patience had reached its limit under the weight of the correspondence itself. Byron, though sometimes petulant and demanding, at least received from Murray a dignified and moving letter asserting that a man in the publisher's position could possess the feelings and principles of a gentleman, a quiet remonstrance that speaks to the indignities Murray endured from those whose work he championed. The essay closes by noting that the friends of authors were often as trying as the authors themselves, offering inflated valuations of manuscripts and expecting Murray to accept their assessments as binding. The Reverend Milman forewarned Murray that his friends considered his poem worth a very high price, and Murray was obliged to explain, as politely as possible, that since he was the one paying, his own judgment of the commercial prospects was more relevant than theirs. The most stinging example of ingratitude comes from Southey, who, having received generous payment from the Quarterly for many years, wrote to inform Murray with characteristic frankness that he suspected his time could be more profitably and more worthily employed than in writing for his journal, even at the price offered. Throughout, Repplier's tone is one of affectionate irony. She presents Murray as a figure whose dignity, patience, and genuine love of literature made him uniquely vulnerable to exploitation, and her essay serves as a witty corrective to the enduring mythology of the suffering author and the tyrannical publisher.

By Agnes Repplier · First published 1922 · Genre: Essay, Literary Criticism, Non-Fiction · 3,376 words

First lines

In reading the recently published _Memoirs and Correspondence of John Murray_, a very interesting and valuable piece of biography-albeit somewhat lengthy for these hurried days-we are forcibly impressed with one surprising truth which we were far from suspecting in our ignorance-namely, that the publisher's life, like the policeman's, is not a happy one, but filled to the brim with vexations peculiarly his own. It was as much the fashion in Murray's time as it is in ours to bewail the hard fate of down-trodden authors, and to hint that he who prints the book absorbs the praise and profit which belong in justice to him who writes it. In fact, that trenchant and time-honored jest, "Now Barabbas was a publisher," dates from this halcyon period when _Marmion_ was sold for a thousand guineas, and the third canto of _Childe Harold_ for nearly twice that sum. Murray himself possessed such influence in the literary world that the battle with the public was thought to be half won when a book appeared armed with the sanction of his name. He was a man of wealth, too, of social standing, of severe and fastidious tastes; exactly fitted by circumstances, if not by nature, to play the autocratic _rôle_ popularly assigned to all his craft, to crush the aspiring poet in the dust, to freeze the budding genius who sought assistance at his hands, to override with haughty arrogance the wan and needy scholar who waited at his door. Instead of this, we see him enduring with lamblike gentleness an amount of provocation which would have hallowed a medieval saint, and which seems to our undisciplined spirits as wantonly exasperating and malign.

What this Textopian page supports

Trials of a Publisher is listed on Textopian as an essay by Agnes Repplier, dated 1922 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Genres

Tags

essay · literary criticism · publishing industry · book trade · authors · manuscripts · editors · literary satire · humor · Victorian literature · American literature · cultural commentary

More by Agnes Repplier