National Debt and Landholders

National Debt and Landholders

The work examines the implications of national debt on society, questioning its perceived burdens. It argues that the debt, primarily owed to the nation itself, should not be viewed as a liability but rather as a mechanism for stimulating economic activity. The author critiques the notion that taxation diminishes capital accumulation, suggesting instead that the concentration of wealth is detrimental to economic health. A proposed solution includes implementing a graduated property tax alongside a substantial loan, which could redistribute wealth more effectively. The text emphasizes the moral responsibilities tied to property ownership, particularly land, contrasting it with the more abstract nature of financial assets. The author contends that land should not be treated merely as a commodity but as a resource requiring stewardship and labor. The discussion extends to the nature of taxation, likening it to the circulation of blood within a body, where the flow of resources is essential for vitality. The author critiques the misinterpretation of taxation as a drain on resources, instead framing it as a necessary process for maintaining economic balance and promoting public welfare. Overall, the work advocates for a reevaluation of property rights and responsibilities, urging a return to principles that align economic practices with moral and social duties. It calls for a more equitable distribution of wealth and a recognition of the interconnectedness of property, labor, and the broader community.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1816 · Genre: Political Economy, Philosophy, Sociopolitical Commentary · 923 words

First lines

What evil results now to this country, taken at large, from the actual existence of the National Debt? I never could get a plain and practical answer to that question. I do not advert to the past loss of capital, although it is hard to see how that capital can be said to have been unproductive, which produces, in the defence of the nation itself, the conditions of the permanence and productivity of all other capital. As to taxation to pay the interest, how can the country suffer by a process, under which the money is never one minute out of the pockets of the people? You may just as well say that a man is weakened by the circulation of his blood. There may, certainly, be particular local evils and grievances resulting from the mode of taxation or collection; but how can that debt be in any proper sense a burthen to the nation, which the nation owes to itself, and to no one but itself? It is a juggle to talk of the nation owing the capital or the interest to the stockholders; it owes to itself only. Suppose the interest to be owing to the Emperor of Russia, and then you would feel the difference of a debt in the proper sense. It is really and truly nothing more in effect than so much moneys or money's worth, raised annually by the state for the purpose of quickening industry.[1]

Similar titles

Genres

Tags

National Debt · Landholders · Taxation · Political Economy · Capital · Property Tax · Economic Theory · Self-Interest · Agriculture · Industry · Wealth Distribution · Public Finance

What this Textopian page supports

National Debt and Landholders is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1816 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

More by Samuel Taylor Coleridge