
The work examines the relationship between Shakespeare and his contemporaries, particularly focusing on the evolution of his dramatic style and thematic depth. It highlights the early works, such as "Love's Labour's Lost," showcasing Shakespeare's unique blend of poetic sweetness and intellectual rigor. The text suggests that Shakespeare's genius lies in his ability to reconcile poetic creativity with dramatic structure, allowing for profound philosophical exploration within the confines of theater. Coleridge notes that Shakespeare's early plays contain sketches of characters that would later develop into more complex figures, illustrating his growth as a playwright. The analysis emphasizes the natural flow of Shakespeare's dialogue, where each line seamlessly leads to the next, creating a cohesive narrative that reflects his mastery of rhythm and language. The critique extends to other dramatists of the time, particularly Massinger, whose works are compared unfavorably to Shakespeare's. Coleridge argues that while Massinger's text has been improved, it still lacks the depth and fluidity found in Shakespeare's writing. He points out the limitations of contemporary critics, such as Gifford, who fail to appreciate the rhythmic qualities of Shakespeare's work. Coleridge also discusses the conventions of the old dramatists, particularly their use of disguise and mistaken identity, which Shakespeare employs sparingly. He cites "Twelfth Night" and "The Comedy of Errors" as examples where this technique is effectively utilized, with the latter being classified as a farce due to its reliance on improbable situations for comedic effect. Overall, the analysis presents a nuanced view of Shakespeare's contributions to drama, emphasizing his innovative techniques and the depth of his characterizations, while contrasting them with the works of his contemporaries. The text serves as a critical exploration of the evolution of English drama, positioning Shakespeare as a pivotal figure in its development.
By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1905 · Genre: Literary Criticism, Drama, Poetry · 633 words
I think I could point out to a half line what is really Shakspeare's in Love's Labour Lost, and some other of the not entirely genuine plays. What he wrote in that play is of his earliest manner, having the all-pervading sweetness which he never lost, and that extreme condensation which makes the couplets fall into epigrams, as in the Venus and Adonis, and Rape of Lucrece. [1] In the drama alone, as Shakspeare soon found out, could the sublime poet and profound philosopher find the conditions of a compromise. In the Love's Labour Lost there are many faint sketches of some of his vigorous portraits in after-life -- as for example, in particular, of Benedict and Beatrice.[2]
Shakespeare and the Old Dramatists is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1905 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Shakespeare · Coleridge · drama · literature · Old Dramatists · Love's Labour Lost · poetry · theater · character analysis · contemporary playwrights · epigrams · sublime