The Unsettling of America (1977)

The Unsettling of America (1977)

The Unsettling of America argues that modern industrial agriculture is not a lasting achievement but a destructive system that sacrifices land, farmers, communities, and culture to profit, technological expansion, and corporate power. The author begins from opposition to policies that treat small farmers as a surplus population and assume that technological advances justify their displacement. He contends that the advice to farm “fencerow to fencerow” has accelerated erosion, chemical pollution, debt, rural depopulation, and the concentration of land in fewer hands. American history is presented as a conflict between exploitation and nurture. The dominant tendency has been conquest: the pursuit of wealth has repeatedly destroyed settled communities, first among Indians and then among small farmers, tradespeople, households, and other local cultures. Exploitation values efficiency, specialization, speed, profit, and quantity; nurture values care, health, carrying capacity, workmanship, local responsibility, and continuity. Food, the author insists, is not a weapon or a mere commodity: it arises from the union of land, people, culture, and patient husbandry. The book attacks specialization as the disease of modern character. By surrendering food, health, education, conservation, and other necessities to experts, people become dependent consumers who can provide little for themselves. Institutions often act against their professed purposes: conservation groups invest in destructive corporations, doctors treat diseases without attending to health, and schools may preserve ignorance. Neither donations nor organizations can substitute for personal responsibility. A responsible consumer must refuse unnecessary and inferior goods, moderate needs, and become in some degree a producer—preparing food, growing food, repairing, making, and sustaining household capacities. Conservation, too, must move beyond protecting scenic wilderness while ignoring the destruction caused by ordinary life. Wilderness is necessary as memory, as a place humans leave alone, and as a standard by which civilization can judge its effects. Yet most land must be used, and the essential question is how to practice “kindly use”: a local, knowledgeable, adaptive use that respects the differing character of each field, place, household, and community. Generalized industrial methods cannot be kindly because land itself is diverse. The author contrasts an older farm-and-household economy with the modern division between producer and consumer. In the earlier pattern, farms and households shared food production: farms were diversified, families raised much of what they ate, townspeople gardened and prepared raw foods, and local markets supported minor produce. The newer economy turns farms into factories and households into sites of consumption, while merchants and corporations take over production and processing. Cheapness, convenience, and quantity replace health, thrift, soil fertility, and craftsmanship. Henry County, Kentucky, exemplifies this transformation. Once characterized by small, diversified family farms, local markets, work animals, household production, and pride in thrift, it has become more mechanized, indebted, absentee-owned, and culturally unstable. Small producers lose their markets, young people expect to leave, farms deteriorate, and rural communities are emptied. Policies of “get big or get out” are judged no less cruel in result than overt forced removals, because they drive people away through economic power. Official agricultural rhetoric praises exports, productivity, specialization, large farms, purchased inputs, and “agripower,” while ignoring soil maintenance, small farmers, and the dependence of farming on petroleum. Such policy treats food as a means of trade and geopolitical power, not as a cultural necessity. It makes farms dependent on machines, chemicals, credit, and foreign fuel; it also encourages monocultures, erosion, confinement livestock, and the separation of animals from the fertility cycle of the soil. Visions of the farm-of-the-future—remote-controlled fields, enclosed crops, giant livestock buildings, automated feeding, and computerized management—reveal the totalitarian ambition of agricultural expertise. These models promise abundance and control but exclude people, community, health, uncertainty, and the complexity of living systems. The author argues that total control produces disorder: rigidly controlled systems become vulnerable, while health depends on resilience, diversity, and cooperation. Such industrial farms would place land, food, and consumers under corporate control, leaving most people detached from the sources of their lives. Against the machine metaphor, the author proposes the “Wheel of Life”: the cycle in which soil, plants, animals, people, death, decay, and renewal sustain one another. Biological energy must be used through production, consumption, and return. Organic wastes belong back in the soil; soil is the living connector of all bodies and the basis of community. Farming is therefore not merely science or business but a practical art, a cultural practice, and a form of religious attention. Good farming requires diverse crops and animals, rotation, manure, humus, erosion control, water conservation, small holdings, local energy, human skill, and the protection of the source. The larger crisis is moral. Modern society isolates work from home, body from soul, people from place, and consumption from responsibility. It mistakes limitless energy and endless technological growth for salvation, colonizing the future by consuming the resources on which future life depends. The author argues that energy scarcity is fundamentally a crisis of use and restraint, not simply supply. The Amish are offered as an example of a community that limits machinery in order to preserve family, work, faith, and local integrity. Health means wholeness: body, soul, community, soil, food, and world cannot be healed separately. The degradation of land accompanies the degradation of bodies, work, culture, and spirit. Exploitation breaks the connections that make life possible; healing restores them through responsibility, skill, care, and communal participation in the cycles of Creation.

By Wendell Berry · First published 1977 · Genre: Nonfiction, Environmental Writing, Agricultural Criticism · 12 chapters · 101,291 words

First lines

This book was meant to be a criticism of what I have called modern or orthodox agriculture. As I now realize, it is more a review than a criticism. Criticism requires a subject that is "finished. " When agriculture is "finished," no would-be critic will be available. I am therefore constrained to accept my demotion as a privilege.

What this Textopian page supports

The Unsettling of America (1977) is listed on Textopian as an essay by Wendell Berry, dated 1977 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Genres

Tags

environmentalism · agrarianism · sustainable agriculture · rural life · land stewardship · industrial agriculture · ecological ethics · localism · conservation · food systems · farm culture · American society

Contents

More by Wendell Berry