A Treatise on Parents and Children

Explore "A Treatise on Parents and Children" by George Bernard Shaw on Textopian. Read with annotations and highlights.

In practice what happens is that parents notice that boys brought up at / home become mollycoddles, or prigs, or duffers, unable to take care of / themselves. They see that boys should learn to rough it a little and / to mix with children of their own age. This is natural enough. When you / have preached at and punished a boy until he is a moral cripple, you / are as much hampered by him as by a physical cripple; and as you do not / intend to have him on your hands all your life, and are generally rather / impatient for the day when he will earn his own living and leave you to / attend to yourself, you sooner or later begin to talk to him about the / need for self-reliance, learning to think, and so forth, with the result / that your victim, bewildered by your inconsistency, concludes that there / is no use trying to please you, and falls into an attitude of sulky / resentment. Which is an additional inducement to pack him off to school.

In school, he finds himself in a dual world, under two dispensations. / There is the world of the boys, where the point of honor is to be / untameable, always ready to fight, ruthless in taking the conceit out of / anyone who ventures to give himself airs of superior knowledge or taste, / and generally to take Lucifer for one's model. And there is the world of / the masters, the world of discipline, submission, diligence, obedience, / and continual and shameless assumption of moral and intellectual / authority. Thus the schoolboy hears both sides, and is so far better / off than the homebred boy who hears only one. But the two sides are / not fairly presented. They are presented as good and evil, as vice and / virtue, as villainy and heroism. The boy feels mean and cowardly when / he obeys, and selfish and rascally when he disobeys. He looses his moral / courage just as he comes to hate books and languages. In the end, John / Ruskin, tied so close to his mother's apron-string that he did not / escape even when he went to Oxford, and John Stuart Mill, whose father / ought to have been prosecuted for laying his son's childhood waste with / lessons, were superior, as products of training, to our schoolboys. They / were very conspicuously superior in moral courage; and though they did / not distinguish themselves at cricket and football, they had quite as / much physical hardihood as any civilized man needs. But it is to be / observed that Ruskin's parents were wise people who gave John a full / share in their own life, and put up with his presence both at home and / abroad when they must sometimes have been very weary of him; and Mill, / as it happens, was deliberately educated to challenge all the most / sacred institutions of his country. The households they were brought / up in were no more average households than a Montessori school is an / average school.

Reading navigation