Battle of the Babies

Battle of the Babies by Agnes Repplier

"Battle of the Babies" by Agnes Repplier is an essay that explores the debate over the appropriateness of traditional fairy tales for children. The conflict begins with a New York periodical advocating for the removal of violent and grim fairy tales from children's literature, arguing that such stories are harmful to young minds. This stance is challenged by Andrew Lang, a critic who defends the value of these tales, emphasizing their historical and cultural significance. Lang argues that exposure to stories involving suffering and sin is an inevitable part of literary education and that such tales have been enjoyed by generations without adverse effects. The debate extends across the Atlantic, with American and British perspectives clashing over the sensitivity of children to these stories. A Boston paper supports the New York periodical, suggesting that American children are too sensitive for the harsh realities depicted in traditional tales. Repplier questions this view, suggesting that the emotional and spiritual development of children can be enriched by exposure to such stories. She argues that fairy tales cultivate a child's emotions and imagination, much like the religious and artistic influences seen in historical contexts. Repplier highlights the enduring nature of these stories, noting that they have survived through time due to their intrinsic merit. She suggests that attempts to sanitize children's literature overlook the value of these tales in fostering imagination and emotional growth. The essay concludes by asserting that despite modern criticisms, traditional fairy tales will continue to captivate children, as they are an essential part of cultural heritage and storytelling.

By Agnes Repplier · First published 1908 · Genre: Satire, Literary Criticism, Essay · 2,233 words

First lines

A warfare has been raging in our midst, the echoes of which have hardly yet died sullenly away upon either side of the Atlantic. It has been a bloodless and un-Homeric strife, not without humorous side-issues, as when Pistol and Bardolph and Fluellen come to cheer our anxious spirits at the siege of Harfleur. Its first guns were heard in New York, where a modest periodical, devoted to the training of parents, opened fire upon those time-honored nursery legends which are presumably dear to the hearts of all rightly constituted babies. The leader of this gallant foray protested vehemently against all fairy tales of a mournful or sanguinary cast, and her denunciation necessarily included many stories which have for generations been familiar to every little child. She rejected _Red Riding Hood_, because her own infancy was haunted and embittered by the evil behavior of the wolf; she would have none of _Bluebeard_, because he was a wholesale fiend and murderer; she would not even allow the pretty _Babes in the Wood_, because they tell a tale of cold-hearted cruelty and of helpless suffering; while all fierce narratives of giants and ogres and magicians were to be banished ruthlessly from our shelves. Verily, reading will be but gentle sport in the virtuous days to come.

What this Textopian page supports

Battle of the Babies is listed on Textopian as an essay by Agnes Repplier, dated 1908 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Genres

Tags

infant behavior · parenting · social satire · humor · irony · child development · cultural commentary · family dynamics · child psychology · satirical narrative · observational humor · social critique

More by Agnes Repplier