
The text argues for the inclusion of Anarchists in an upcoming international congress, asserting that Anarchist-Communists and Collectivists share fundamental goals with Socialists, such as the abolition of class structures and monopolies. The author contends that Anarchists seek a society where resources and production are communally owned, allowing individuals to benefit from their labor without exploitation. The piece critiques the notion that Anarchists are not Socialists, emphasizing that their approach to achieving workers' rights is through organized efforts rather than reliance on governmental concessions. It posits that parliamentary systems inherently serve the interests of the ruling class and cannot genuinely represent the working class. The author argues for a decentralized, voluntary organization of society, warning against the emergence of a new political elite that could arise from centralized decision-making. The text highlights the importance of unity among workers in the economic struggle against capitalism, suggesting that political divisions hinder this solidarity. It critiques Social Democrats for attempting to impose their specific political agenda on the labor movement, which could lead to fragmentation and weaken collective efforts against capitalist oppression. The author reflects on historical tensions within the labor movement, particularly between Marxists and Anarchists, noting that past conflicts over political ideologies detracted from the essential class struggle. The text warns against repeating these mistakes, advocating for a focus on economic solidarity over political disagreements. Ultimately, the author calls for a united front among all workers, regardless of their political beliefs, to combat capitalism effectively. The plea is for recognition of the shared struggle against exploitation, urging that all workers should be able to collaborate in their fight for emancipation without being divided by differing political ideologies. The text concludes with a call for unity, echoing the famous rallying cry for workers to unite globally.
By Errico Malatesta · First published 1893 · Genre: Political Philosophy, Social Critique, Anarchism · 1,458 words
Why not? Perhaps because, as they have said, we are not Socialists. Well, if there are any persons who delight in calling themselves Anarchists, and who are not Socialists, certainly they have nothing to do with a Socialist Congress, and they ought to have no desire to take part in it. But we Anarchist-Communists or Collectivists desire the abolition of monopolies of all kinds; we demand the complete abolition of classes and all domination and exploitation of man by man; we wish that the land and all the instruments of production and distribution, as well as the wealth accumulated by the labour of past generations, should become by the expropriation of its present holders the common property of all mankind, so that all that work shall be able to enjoy the full produce of their work, either in full Communism or by each man receiving according to his efforts, according to the will and agreement of those interested. We wish to substitute for competition and war among men fraternity and solidarity in work for the good of all. And we have spread this ideal, and have struggled and suffered for its realisation for long years, and in some countries -- Italy and Spain -- long before the birth of parliamentary Socialism. What honest and well-informed man will affirm that we are not Socialists?
Should Anarchists be Admitted to the Coming International Congress? is listed on Textopian as an essay by Errico Malatesta, dated 1893 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Anarchism · Politics · Internationalism · Congress · Revolution · Socialism · Liberty · Freedom · Autonomy · Organization · Society · Economy