Ear and Taste for Music

Ear and Taste for Music

The work explores the distinction between an ear for music and a taste for music, emphasizing that one can appreciate music deeply without possessing technical skill. The author reflects on personal experiences at concerts, contrasting the emotional responses elicited by different composers, particularly favoring Beethoven over Rossini. The narrative shifts to a critique of political events, specifically the Brussels riot, which the author dismisses as a misguided and unjust rebellion, likening it to the folly of the French Revolution. The author expresses a strong opinion on the nature of political uprisings, suggesting that they often stem from irrational fears rather than legitimate grievances. The text also touches on the author's spiritual experiences, particularly the appreciation of the English liturgy after attending church services in rural Scotland, highlighting a newfound recognition of its beauty. This juxtaposition of music and politics serves to illustrate broader themes of perception, value, and the subjective nature of both art and societal movements. Overall, the work presents a nuanced examination of how personal taste and societal events intertwine, revealing the complexities of human experience in both artistic and political realms.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1817 · Genre: Philosophical Essay, Music Criticism, Political Commentary · 345 words

First lines

REVOLUTION.

In politics, what begins in fear usually ends in folly.

What this Textopian page supports

Ear and Taste for Music is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1817 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Discussion starters

Similar titles

Genres

Tags

music · Coleridge · aesthetics · politics · revolution · Beethoven · Rossini · delight · taste · ear · literature · Scotland

More by Samuel Taylor Coleridge