
This philosophical essay explores two types of knowledge: acquaintance and description. Acquaintance refers to direct experience or perception of an object or concept, whereas description involves understanding through language or concepts. The essay argues that our understanding of the world is based on a combination of both types of knowledge. Acquaintance provides immediate access to objects and experiences, while description allows for abstract thinking and generalization. However, description can also lead to misunderstandings if not grounded in acquaintance. The essay concludes that true understanding requires a balance between these two forms of knowledge, with acquaintance serving as the foundation for descriptive knowledge.
By Bertrand Russell · First published 1912 · Genre: Philosophy, Nonfiction, Academic · 8,746 words
The object of the following paper is to consider what it is that we know in cases where we know propositions about "the so-and-so" without knowing who or what the so-and-so is. For example, I know that the candidate who gets most votes will be elected, though I do not know who is the candidate who will get most votes. The problem I wish to consider is: What do we know in these cases, where the subject is merely described? I have considered this problem elsewhere[40] from a purely logical point of view; but in what follows I wish to consider the question in relation to theory of knowledge as well as in relation to logic, and in view of the above-mentioned logical discussions, I shall in this paper make the logical portion as brief as possible.
Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description is listed on Textopian as an essay by Bertrand Russell, dated 1912 CE.
This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.
Philosophy · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Logic · Perception · Reasoning · Belief · Truth · Justification · Inference · Induction · Deductive Reasoning