Massinger and Shakespeare

Massinger and Shakespeare

The work provides a critical examination of the plays of Massinger and contrasts them with those of Shakespeare. It begins by asserting that poetry must possess either musicality or intellectual substance to engage the reader. The author praises specific works by Massinger, highlighting the excellence of the first act of "The Virgin Martyr" and the overall quality of "The Very Woman" and "The Bondman." Massinger's ability to entertain and create narratives akin to novels is acknowledged, though the author critiques his tendency toward exaggerated emotional expressions. The analysis delves into character portrayals, particularly focusing on the extremes of villainy and moral complexity. The author notes that while Massinger's characters often embody exaggerated passions, Shakespeare's villains, such as Regan and Goneril, are depicted with a stark absence of redeeming qualities. In contrast, characters like Edmund are presented with a blend of ambition and moral ambiguity, allowing for a more nuanced exploration of human nature. The text emphasizes Shakespeare's unique approach to villainy, using these characters as vehicles for expressing complex ideas and opinions that might be too controversial for more straightforward characters. The author points out that Shakespeare's villains often articulate thoughts that reflect deeper truths about human nature and societal norms. The work also references specific scenes and dialogues from various plays, illustrating the stylistic and thematic connections between the works of Massinger and Shakespeare. The author notes that certain elements in "The Spanish Tragedy" attributed to Kyd bear resemblance to Shakespeare's style, suggesting a shared literary heritage among these playwrights. Overall, the analysis serves as a comparative study of the dramatic techniques and thematic concerns of Massinger and Shakespeare, highlighting the former's entertainment value and the latter's profound exploration of moral complexity and human psychology. The author concludes that while both playwrights contribute significantly to the landscape of English drama, Shakespeare's depth and insight into the human condition set him apart from his contemporaries.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1818 · Genre: Literary Criticism, Drama, Poetry · 2,240 words

First lines

To please me, a poem must be either music or sense; if it is neither, I confess I cannot interest myself in it.

The first act of the Virgin Martyr is as fine an act as I remember in any play. The Very Woman is, I think, one of the most perfect plays we have. There is some good fun in the first scene between Don John, or Antonio, and Cuculo, his master[1]; and can any thing exceed the skill and sweetness of the scene between him and his mistress, in which he relates his story? [2] The Bondman is also a delightful play. Massinger is always entertaining; his plays have the interest of novels.

What this Textopian page supports

Massinger and Shakespeare is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1818 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Discussion starters

Similar titles

Genres

Tags

literary analysis · drama · theater · Shakespeare · Massinger · English literature · playwrights · comparative literature · 17th century · tragedy · comedy · character analysis

More by Samuel Taylor Coleridge