Taxation and Representation

Taxation and Representation

The work critiques the relationship between taxation and representation, arguing against the notion that taxation is only legitimate when accompanied by direct representation. It categorizes the sovereign's actions regarding property into three types: plunder, tribute, and taxation. Plunder is characterized as violent and lawless, while tribute involves a legal framework dictated by the conqueror. Taxation, in contrast, is presented as a compact that benefits the taxpayer, allowing them to enjoy their remaining property in peace. The author challenges the idea that only those directly represented should be taxed, highlighting the absurdity of excluding certain groups, such as women with separate property, from the political process. The argument extends to unmarried women of means, asserting their moral right to vote if taxation without representation is deemed tyranny. The text posits that direct representation is impractical and potentially harmful. The critique also touches on the limitations of prominent thinkers, such as Johnson, who lacked a broader understanding of life beyond urban settings. A discussion with Horne Tooke on language and etymology illustrates the author's engagement with philosophical ideas, emphasizing the distinction between community and individual property through linguistic analysis. The work ultimately advocates for a more nuanced understanding of political representation and the complexities of taxation.

By Samuel Taylor Coleridge · First published 1796 · Genre: Political Philosophy, Essay, Social Commentary · 760 words

First lines

I like Dr. Johnson's political pamphlets better than any other parts of his works: -particularly his "Taxation no Tyranny" is very clever and spirited, though he only sees half of his subject, and that not in a very philosophical manner. Plunder -- Tribute -- Taxation -- are the three gradations of action by the sovereign on the property of the subject. The first is mere violence, bounded by no law or custom, and is properly an act only between conqueror and conquered, and that, too, in the moment of victory. The second supposes law; but law proceeding only from, and dictated by, one party, the conqueror; law, by which he consents to forego his right of plunder upon condition of the conquered giving up to him, of their own accord, a fixed commutation. The third implies compact, and negatives any right to plunder, -- taxation being professedly for the direct benefit of the party taxed, that, by paying a part, he may through the labours and superintendence of the sovereign be able to enjoy the rest in peace.

What this Textopian page supports

Taxation and Representation is listed on Textopian as an essay by Samuel Taylor Coleridge, dated 1796 CE.

This source record anchors work identity, reading entry points, and catalog context for checking claims about the work.

Good citation fit

Discussion starters

Similar titles

Genres

Tags

Taxation · Representation · Political Philosophy · Sovereignty · Property Rights · Social Contract · Justice · Government · Civic Duty · Etymology · Political Theory · Women's Rights

More by Samuel Taylor Coleridge